Insignia VXR - Development
By John Thorne
Sometimes it takes a drive on a familiar road to make you
realise when a car is good or not, the knowledge of a certain road, camber,
corner, roundabout, dual carriageway that you’ve driven countless times before
in a variety of machinery that allows you to make direct comparisons that result
in a conclusion and its taken this for me to make a conclusion on the Insignia
VXR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
At this point Adam (who runs all our websites and reports) will get up, walk over and say “eh, you said it was crap?” and he’d be right, I did, it was crap or more correctly it felt crap for some time but as time has passed I’ve come accustomed to the fact that each time you drove it it got better, noticeably better in fact culminating in this mornings 2 hour test drive at 5am resulting in my asking Christian to go an source us one (we still buy our cars like everyone else, no freebies from Vauxhall sadly). So whats changed?
Handling wise its really feeling pretty good which is
impressive seeing as we’ve not even looked at that (yet, a few sets of lowering
springs are on their way from Eibach to test) in fact I’d say if you drive the
car to its attributes (use the AWD drive, trail brake into corners, make the car
use its drive and grip) and it will cover ground every bit as quick as the
tighter handling Astra and even Corsa VXR models all with an air of charging
about the county in a stately home. The difference in ride between standard and
VXR mode is marked, graphically so, trust me when I say this as I’m testing it
with broken bones as the measure – VXR mode = pain, non VXR mode = no pain which
is impressive as Vauxhalls previous play with electronic damping on the Astra
was awful, they’ve got it right on the Insignia. Handling is such that once you
get out and look back you realise the car is a big old bus in terms of size but
doesn’t feel that way in driving.
I’ve got a few gripes of course, I love the adaptive
headlights but for some reason every time I hit a bump (living in the
countryside means thats pretty often sadly) the lights go to full beam so think
we need to look at that. I also can’t stand the electronic parking brake which
seems to have a mind of its own sometimes refusing to disengage no matter how
many times I stamp on the brake peddle. The brakes are huge Brembo items but
despite their size they seem to run out of steam round Milton Keynes roundabouts
(most standard cars do in fairness, only one we’ve not had issues with of late
is the Nissan GTR) and I find the car hard to park, although thats likely to be
my fault and not the car to be fair. Stereo is good (better than my M3 if I’m
honest), satnav equally as bad as the BMW (think I’m going back to maps) and the
array of buttons on the dash whilst easy to understand seems cheap compared to
BMW’s iDrive, which isn’t itself without its detractors of course. I’m also not
a big fan of the steering wheel, a bit too bling in my view.
This last paragraph demonstrates that road testing cars
really is down to personal choice in 99% of all tests, be that testing from an
engineer, road tester for a magazine or performance upgrade R&D as my role
is but the ultimate measure is always would you put your own money down and buy
one to which the answer is yes. Indeed I’m suitably impressed that we plan to
build a track version for corporate events, fit 4 race seats with harness’s and
use it for passenger rides for tuning shows and action days, you’ve got to be
pretty impressed with a car to look to that as an idea.








